美国医生挺肖:袭击者是傻瓜 不会是肖医生(图)
【北美在线
NAOL.CA】 2010/10/02 分类:科技
北美在线(NAOL.CA):
肖传国是“世界上最伟大的医生之一”,“他不仅属于中国,也属于全世界”
—— 美国科学家高度评价肖传国和“肖氏反射弧”,强烈质疑所谓肖氏袭方说。
肖传国被警方逮捕
Evan Kass,医学博士
博蒙特儿童医院泌尿外科主任
我认识肖医生很多年了,在我看来,他是一个好人,一个充满爱心的医生,天才的外科专家,诚实的研究者。他的外科手术(反射弧手术)的科学基理首先是通过动物实验研究得来的,其成果发表在专业学术期刊上。经过多年的研究,这个成果才被用于人类。我们参与了一项前瞻性研究来评价这个手术,而且已经为这项研究建立了一套切实可行的操作规则。肖医生从一开始就参与了这项操作规则的建立,与我们进行了充分合作,并清楚该研究结果将被公布。他没有试图掩盖他的任何研究结果或者任何相关信息。他被美国的医生和科学家们认作是一个值得尊敬的同事。另一方面,方先生(方舟子)是一个曾经被揭发剽窃他人成果的人,而肖医生就是那个揭发者。方先生因此不顾一切地寻求报复,利用各种机会试图诋毁肖医生。这种攻击是令人难以想象和置信的。说肖医生这样的人会去雇佣几个傻瓜去打方先生、不久回国去让人逮捕,这样的事是没有道理的。如果他真的雇人做这种事,难道他不会知道这些人在他自阿根廷回国前就会被逮捕,而避免回国吗?肖医生是个聪明的人,而制造这个袭击企图的人是某个傻瓜,不会是肖医生。【张清翻译】
英文原文: Evan Kass MD
Chief of Pediatric Urology
Beaumont Children's Hospital
I have known Dr Xiao for years and in my
opinion, he is a good man, a caring
physician, gifted surgeon, and an honest
investigator. The scientific basis for his
surgical procedure was initially developed
in the animal laboratory and the results
published in peer reviewed journals. Only
after years of research was it applied to
humans. We have been involved in a
prospective study to evaluate this procedure
and have constructed a valid research
protocol for this project. Dr Xiao, has been
involved with the deveopment of the research
protocol and has cooperated fully with us
and understands that the results of this
study will be published. He has not tried to
hide any of his research results or any
other information. He is considered by the
physicians and scientists in the United
States as a respected colleague. Mr Fang, on
the other hand, is an individual who is
reported to have published research that was
not his, and was reportedly called on it by
Dr Xiao.
He has conducted himself as a man seeking
revenge at all costs and has tried to
discredit Dr Xiao at every turn. One has to
wonder if these claims of assault are real
or imaginary. It makes no sense for a man of
Dr Xiao's stature to hire some fools to
punch Mr Fang and then return to China
sometime later to be arrested. If he had
hired someone for this task, wouldn't he
have known that they were arrested prior to
his return to China from Argentina and
avoided arrest?? Dr Xiao is a brilliant man,
and this reported assault attempt seems to
be the work of a fool, not Dr Xiao.
Gary
Over the past few days, I have only slept
three hours each day and have read a lot
online about Dr. Xiao and Mr. Fang. I feel
that it is my obligation to let the world
know what kind of person Dr. Xiao is.I
frankly tell everyone that I make friends
only with those who are unselfish and care
about others. Even though we are friends
from the
same school or same class if I find him
selfish, then we are not friends anymore. I
have known Dr. Xiao for thirty years since
1980. Dr. Xiao is my friend because he meets
my standards for being a friend. Dr. Xiao is
a decent unselfish and upright fellow, who
works very hard for his patients and for the
health of all mankind.
In 1986 we lived in the same building and
same floor, with our doors facing each
other, separated by the hallway. Later on he
went to England, and I came to the United
States. We met again in Washington DC in
1988. In January 1995 my brother came to the
US for Graduate Studies and he was supposed
to arrive at 6:30pm. Unfortunately my car
completely broke down on that day at 3pm. It
takes two hours from Philadelphia to JFK
airport. I was nervous and sweating. I
called my friends in NY; there was no one
available to help. When I called Dr. Xiao,
he agreed to help without any hesitation. I
couldn’t imagine how my brother would feel
if no one showed up to pick him up at the
airport. I went to Xiao’s home at 9pm to
collect my brother. My brother always
appreciated Dr. Xiao’s kind help for his
first arrival in the United States. Xiao
said it is too trivial to mention it, and
that you would do the same if you were me.
When we had moved from University of
Pennsylvania to New York in 1995, we
contacted each other more often.In the new
year of 1997 my wife and I invited Dr. Xiao
to a restaurant; we tried to persuade him to
stay in the US to pursue Surgical Urology.
He said he is going to have a big grant
from NIH for another five years. He would
continue to do research here. In the
meantime he would also return to china,
because there were many paralyzed patients
in China from coal mine collapses needed
him. He could have had a US citizenship very
easily, however he didn’t want it. He stated
after he finished this five year grant, he
would return to china permanently.
Gradually he spent more and more time in
China than here at NYU until finally he
symbolically traveled to NYU twice a year.
He was invited to give lectures all over the
world to tell urologists and neurosurgeons
about this procedure he invented; so that
they may help more people worldwide. Unlike
Fang’s claim that Dr. Xiao’s procedure had a
73% failure rate, Dr. Xiao’s revolutionary
surgical procedure can be successfully
reproduced all over the world, from United
States to Chile and Argentina.
However Mr. Fang started to claim that Dr.
Xiao was a full time professor at NYU,
therefore not qualified to apply for
member/fellow of Chinese Medical Academy.
Besides that he claimed that Dr. Xiao’s
procedure was not medically sound. Mr. Fang
also tried to undermine Dr. Xiao’s
professional and academic contributions.Dr.
Xiao sued Fang in Wuhan, China for
Libel/slander and won that case. Mr. Fang
claimed that Xiao had won the case because
that it was Xiao’s home City. Dr. Xiao then
sued Fang in his home city which was
Beijing.
But Fang claimed and the Beijing Court
agreed that he is a permanent resident of
the US, and that Chinese law did not apply
to him, although he lived in Beijing all
year round. Dr. Xiao then sued Mr. Fang in
the United States. But when the summons was
delivered to Fang’s Address in California,
there was no such person living there at
all. Because Dr. Xiao exhausted all the
legal ways that he may counter Mr. Fang with
no success. Mr. Fang attacked Dr. Xiao even
more aggressively in any opportunity he had
without any fear of reprimand.Please note it
is illegal, immoral, and unethical for
someone with bad faith to instigate patients
or make fake stories to sue Dr. Xiao.
However, no matter how aggressive and
dirty Mr. Fang treated Dr. Xiao, Dr. Xiao
should tolerate and tolerate again. We
condemn all kinds of violence no matter who
did it. Our world is not perfect. We have
people with personal interest, who
intentionally attack Dr. Xiao with bad
faith.
Now Mr. Fang has won, and Dr. Xiao is in
police custody. It is a tragedy for Dr. Xiao
and a tragedy for the world. The world will
lose one of the greatest doctors. Do you
think Mr. Fang bad faith slander and Beijing
Courts unjust are responsible for this?
Dr. Xiao is a great doctor, who not only
belongs to China, but also to the whole
world. He travels around the world to teach
other urologists and neurosurgeons the
method he invented to help paralyzed
patients gain control over their lives.
Doctors all over the world will respect,
salute, and sympathize with Dr. Xiao.
来源:[news.sciencemag.org]
相关报道
美医生挺肖:袭击者是傻瓜 不是肖医生
耐人寻味:国际学术同仁声援肖传国(图)
百名华人学者为何倒方舟子挺肖传国?
人民网:警惕肖传国唐俊这样的海归(图)
社会已宣判我无罪—肖传国法庭辩护词
肖传国:我交待可以打得鼻青脸肿不能打残
阅读或发表评论(热评中)
返回北美在线首页
热点专题
视频
春晚
奥运
西藏
艳照
海归
华南虎
王千源
胡紫薇
地震
猪流感
毒奶粉
大选
健康
杨佳
金融危机
贪腐
骗假
华社
贺梅
朱海洋
唐炜臻
蒋国兵
奇闻趣事
财经
警匪
情感
|